Get to Know Rachel Brosnahan. Worst Movies Ever Made. Share this Rating Title: Laughter in the Dark 6. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Learn more More Like This. A Taste of Honey The Sailor from Gibraltar A Delicate Balance The Charge of the Light Brigade GP Biography Crime Drama. Edit Cast Credited cast: Sir Edward More Anna Karina Herve Tourace Peter Bowles Lady Pamela More Sebastian Breaks Amelia More Edward Gardner Miss Porly Willoughby Goddard Maid Rest of cast listed alphabetically: In fact, what she possesses in beauty is best captured by the imagination rather than even a still camera.
Only Albinus's wealth ensures that she gets to play her role. Margot realizes that she has played the role poorly and Albinus worries about her reaction. Rex, however, adores seeing the girl from the streets suffer and takes the opportunity to exploit her ineptitude. After Margot becomes upset when viewing the film, Albinus coaxes her into taking a holiday to the south.
They rent a hotel room and, after a chance encounter with an old friend, Albinus happens to surmise that Margot and Rex are engaged in an affair. He has always been envious of Rex in the belief that he is the truest of artists, unlike him. He has stolen beautiful young things from Albinus his whole life, and this is no different. Albinus steals away with Margot and leaves Rex at the hotel. On their journey out of town, Albinus, a self-proclaimed poor driver, crashes the car and is blinded, leaving him in need of care and oblivious to the world around him.
Rex and Margot take advantage of his handicap, and rent a chalet in Switzerland where Rex poses as Albinus's doctor, although Albinus is unaware of Rex's presence. Unknown to Albinus, he is mocked and tortured during his recovery. He becomes increasingly suspicious as his ears become more attuned and he perceives someone's presence, but his fears are never confirmed.
Paul, Albinus's brother-in-law, suspects forgery Rex and Margot have been bleeding Albinus's accounts dry by forging his signature on cheques , drives to the residence and discovers Rex toying with Albinus in his blinded state. Paul then escorts Albinus back to the home of his ex-wife Elisabeth. After a short time, Albinus receives a call informing him that Fraulein Peters Margot has returned to his flat to collect some things. Despite the fact that the book reveals both the atmosphere and the plot immediately, it kept my interest from start to finish.
Both protagonists are hard to love, but easy to sympathize with. Margot is manipulative, but in an instinctive not a cunning way. Nevertheless, reading about them was very interesting. I suppose it is because they are so human. That goes for all the characters in the novel.
There are no so embellishments in this book, not when it comes to society and human beings.
Intellectuals and artists- both are sometimes driven by their instincts. Sometimes everything comes down to biology. Instincts, desires, and human urges. Human beings are not always as sophisticated as we would like to believe. We mix impulses with love, gratitude with genuine connection.
We fall victims to our desires- over and over again. Laughter in the Dark really is a wonderful novel. Nabokov prose flows with ease, and his writing is both elegant and easy to follow. Like I already mentioned, as far as the plot goes there is nothing new, everything is revealed at start, and yet Nabokov makes "seen a hundred times story" into something rather fascinating.
The characters are poor excuses for human beings most of the time, but it not hard to sympathize with them in spite of that or maybe because of that. Once Albinus leaves his wife for Margot, they live in a somewhat stable relationship. Albinus does not mind. But how long can their happiness last? Margot, an abused child that has grown into a selfish woman is obviously bored in her new relationship. Perhaps predictably, soon another character enters the picture and a triangle is formed. Albinus, a boring intellectual, Margot a young cruel mistress and Rex sadistic artist- quite a love triangle they make.
One question remains to haunt me: What do you think? Vessey Quite recently I had my first impact with Nabokov. I started with "Invitation to a Beheading" followed right away by "Lolita' I don't know if it was t Quite recently I had my first impact with Nabokov. I started with "Invitation to a Beheading" followed right away by "Lolita' I don't know if it was the best choice for a Nabokov virgin but I have to say that I quite liked both of them.
I should put this one on my list as well. Thanks for this as always great review Ivana! Ivana Books Are Magic Vessey wrote: I started with "Invitation to a Beheading" followed right away by "Lolita' I don't know if it was the best choice for a Nabokov virgin but I have I'm happy to hear you liked both of them, I'll look them up. I really need to read Lolita, I think I waited long enough. Not a shocking thematic departure for Nabokov, but the novel nonetheless has its own unique character.
In terms of its tone it is light and ironic, and in its treatment of its themes, uncomplicated. Nabokov suggests the tragic ending in the first paragraph, forgoing any dramatic tension, and allowing the reader to just sit back and enjoy the inevitable train wreck. This is a tragic comedy with the character of a moral parable. I wonder to what extent Nabokov was working through his own issues with fidelity and temptation. What goes around, comes around—right? Ostensibly a story about a man who forsakes his wife and child for a new model vixen read: Yet wince I did.
The novel is excruciating in its escalations of suffering. In a whole mes What goes around, comes around—right? In a whole mess of betrayals, Nabokov almost seems to be trying to one-up himself on who can be awarded the blue ribbon for all-around shittiest human. There are a few runner-ups, terrible people all.
For my reading habits, it is all very straightforward but nonetheless fantastic. Meh, this review sucks. My collection of Fabio-adorned romance thrillers is purely for my own aesthetic enjoyment alone, thank you very much. Back to the Nabo I go-go-go… My sin, my soul. She was Lo, plain Lo, in the morning, standing four feet ten in one sock. She was Lola in slacks.
She was Dolly at school.
She was Dolores on the dotted line. But in my arms she was always Lolita. Did she have a precursor? She did, indeed she did. In point of fact, there might have been no Lolita at all had I not loved, one summer, an initial girl-child. In a princedom by the sea. About as many years before Lolita was born as my age was that summer. You can always count on a murderer for a fancy prose style. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, exhibit number one is what the seraphs, the misinformed, simple, noble-winged seraphs, envied.
Look at this tangle of thorns. Vladimir Nabokov faz exatamente isso. No final, apenas restam dois sentimentos no leitor: View all 4 comments. Nov 24, Rob rated it really liked it. More reviews can be found on my book blog. These are the only two Nabokov novels I've read so far, so I'm hoping he does branch out a bit in his other novels, but this was still a much different story than what happened between Humbert Humbert and Dolores. Where Humbert is a calculated predator, Albert Albinus, this story's older man, is a fumbling and naive fool. He' More reviews can be found on my book blog.
He's a well-off art critic living in Berlin who meets Margot, a seventeen-year-old girl, and becomes obsessed with her. He meets with her on a few occasions and eventually - 'seduces' is not the right word here - convinces her to have an affair with him. She is in control from the very beginning, manipulating him every step of the way to get what she wants while slowly dismantling his life.
We watch as this relationship progresses and becomes shockingly toxic. All of the characters are completely unlikable in this. Albinus is truly pathetic and Margot is just a vile human being from the very beginning of the story, to the point where it was difficult to imagine what Albinus saw in her, although she does get some sympathy being the target of a man too old for her. I don't need characters to be likable, but it's nice to know what others see in them. Yes, she's too young and beautiful, but even the most beautiful people will become unattractive to you over time if they're shallow and unbearable.
It's really Nabokov's writing, though noticeably less polished than Lolita , that pulls you through the middle of this novel.
Laughter in the Dark really shines in its last third, where it becomes delightfully demented. I was not expecting the story to go the way that it did, and it was a lot of fun. It almost felt like a pulpy movie, ending in an unrealistic situation that still managed to be horrific and entertaining to read. This was first translated to English in , but Nabokov is said to have disliked that translation so much that he decided to translate it himself again two years later.
I feel like we don't often get the chance to read a translation done by the original author, so it's a bit of a rare treat. It looks like the rest of his Russian novels were translated either by him or his son. A certain man once lost a diamond cuff-link in the wide blue sea, and twenty years later, on the exact day, a Friday apparently, he was eating a large fish - but there was no diamond inside.
I'm looking forward to reading more of his novels and curious to see what other subjects he tackles in those stories. Jan 31, Ava rated it liked it. My list is few due to a long interval of reluctance due to my limited familiarity with his style, texts and English. However, I have since gained more confidence from reading his "Collected Stories" Penguin, in which I could enjoy reading most of them. Interestingly, this novel written in Russian has been translated into English by Mr Nabokov himself because he was 3.
Interestingly, this novel written in Russian has been translated into English by Mr Nabokov himself because he was displeased with the first English translation published by Jonathan Long in London in https: All in all, there are more or less three characteristics that essentially shape the three key characters' fate, each pertaining to wealthiness Albert Albinus , greed Margot Peters and brazennes Axel Rex. As soon as we keep these in mind while reading, Nabokov's plot and dialogs are simply amazing and gradually realize why conflicts just happen. If Albinus were not well to do, he would not exploit his wealth for anything Margot wants.
If Margot were not greedy, she would not propose a divorce ultimatum from him. If Rex were not brazen, he would not mischievously linger on with Margot in a rented Chalet in Switzerland while Albinus could not see due to his accident.
View all 16 comments. Aug 22, Eric rated it it was amazing.